MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908919389 · doi:10.1183/13993003.01736-2018

Neutrophil extracellular traps in<i>ex vivo</i>lung perfusion perfusate predict the clinical outcome of lung transplant recipients

2019· letter· en· W2908919389 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Caldarone, Andrea Mariscal, Andrew T. Sage, Meraj A. Khan, S. Juvet, Tereza Martinu, R. Zamel, Marcelo Cypel, Mingyao Liu, Nades Palaniyar, Shaf Keshavjee

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsLungMedicineLung transplantationPerfusionEx vivoInternal medicineIn vivoNeutrophil extracellular trapsCardiologyBiologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are detectable in donor ex vivo lung perfusate, and higher levels of NETs in perfusate are associated with worse recipient outcomes after transplanthttp://ow.ly/r4nM30nvZsK

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory JournalSame topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsFrench-language works237,207