L’écoute musicale comme construction du commun
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la tradition musicale idéaliste, l’écoute s’apparente à la plongée dans l’univers singulier de l’oeuvre musicale, conçue comme monade où chaque élément de la réalité a sa représentation : écouter signifie s’immerger dans une intériorité qui forme un monde en soi. La conséquence de cette forme d’écoute est une relative surdité à son environnement immédiat. Certaines formes actuelles d’addiction aurale, bénéficiant notamment du productivisme consumériste, renforcent jusqu’à la caricature cette surdité. C’est sans doute pourquoi de nombreux artistes d’aujourd’hui, et notamment ceux gravitant autour de l’écologie acoustique ou sonore, renversent la perspective et pensent l’écoute comme manière de se mettre en relation avec le monde. Cela passe souvent par une relative disparition de l’oeuvre (au profit de processus) et par un recentrement sur l’acte même d’écouter. Ce renversement n’est pas seulement un choix esthétique, il est aussi politique : il met en avant l’idée que l’écoute peut être construction du commun .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Theoretical or conceptual | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Theoretical or conceptual | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it