Multimodal mobile keystroke dynamics biometrics combining fixed and variable passwords
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent works have demonstrated the possibility to craft successful statistical attacks against keystroke dynamic biometric password. Those attacks leverage the possibility to capture several keystroke dynamics samples for a given password string, and then extract and use their distributional properties to craft the attack. These approaches are by design more likely to be successful when launched against fixed passwords, as several samples of the passwords can be captured through successive login sessions. Although the dynamics obtained from specific keys or key sequences for consecutive passwords slightly vary, by definition the distributional properties remain fairly stable for the same user. One way to thwart such that attack to use a variable password, also know as one‐time password (OTP). However, the fact that the keystroke dynamic OTP is different from one session to the other, makes it extremely difficult to reconstruct a valid biometric profile for a user. Modeling accurate keystroke dynamic OTP is challenging, due to the underlying variability and the sparse amount of information involved. We tackle the aformentioned challenge by presenting, in this paper, by presenting a multimodal approach tat combines fixed and variable keystroke dynamic biometric passwords. We investigate two different fusion models and evaluate our approach using a data set involving 100 different users, yielding encouraging performance results in terms of accuracy and resistance against statistical attacks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".