MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2908947476 · doi:10.4095/222240

Geology, Babiche Mountain, Yukon Territory-Northwest Territories

2006· report· en· W2908947476 on OpenAlexaffabout
K M Fallas, L S Lane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This geological map is derived from regional mapping in the Babiche Mountain (NTS 95C/8) 1:50 000 scale map area, as part of the Geological Survey of Canada's Central Foreland NATMAP project. The Babiche Mountain map area is situated at the southern end of the Franklin Mountains in a foothills physiographic setting. The geology of the area is characterized by sedimentary strata, of Late Devonian to Early Cretaceous age, exposed in a series of asymmetrical box or kink folds whose geometry is controlled largely by the competence of the Carboniferous Mattson Formation. Structure in the area is dominated by the Babiche and Kotaneelee anticlines trending approximately north. En echelon folds at the southern end of the Kotaneelee Range link the Kotaneelee anticline with the Mount Martin anticline to the south. Minor faults with less than a few hundred metres of displacement are also reflected in the map pattern. These faults, with northwesterly strikes, are elements of a second regional trend that creates an interference pattern by interacting with the northerly trending folds. Stratigraphic improvements from previous A-series mapping include the recognition of Permian strata above the Mattson Formation informally known as the Tika formation, the assignment of Triassic strata to the Grayling and Toad formations, and the recognition of the Lower Cretaceous Chinkeh Formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→