MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908958959 · doi:10.4095/220739

Measurements of gas hydrate saturation in sediment cores recovered from the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate production research well

2005· report· en· W2908958959 on OpenAlexaff
Hailong Lu, D Dutrisac, John A. Ripmeester, Fred Wright, Takashi Uchida

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClathrate hydrateSaturation (graph theory)HydrateGeologySediment coreWater saturationMineralogySedimentPetroleum engineeringGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of gas hydrate saturation were carried out to specify its distribution in sediments recovered from the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate production research well, both at the drill site and in the laboratory after the fieldwork was completed. At the Mallik drill site, gas hydrate saturation was estimated from the mass of gas released during gas hydrate dissociation, whereas in the laboratory it was calculated from the volume of gas released from gas hydrate. The evaluation of the test results shows that both methods generate good results, with gas hydrate saturation varying from a few per cent to about 80%, but mainly in the range of 20% to 50%. Compared with the low gas hydrate saturation of silt and silty clay, gas hydrate is relatively abundant in sediments dominated by sand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207