MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908967131 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23453

Production‐limited delayed detached eddy simulation of turbulent flow and heat transfer

2019· article· en· W2908967131 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Puxian Ding, Shuangfeng Wang, Kai Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equationsTurbulenceMechanicsHeat transferLarge eddy simulationDetached eddy simulationTurbulence kinetic energyFlow (mathematics)Open-channel flowPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A hybrid RANS/LES model based on the BSL k‐ω RANS model, termed the production‐limited delayed detached eddy simulation (PL‐DDES) model, was developed for simulating turbulent flow and heat transfer. The PL‐DDES model was obtained by limiting the production of turbulence kinetic energy with the proposed control resolution function. The PL‐DDES model was tested by simulating turbulent flow and heat transfer in a plane and a wavy channel with different thermal boundary conditions and different Reynolds numbers in this paper. The results of the plane channel flow show that the performance of the PL‐DDES model is better than that of the improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) model for alleviating the log‐law layer mismatch (LLM) issue. With a much coarser grid resolution, although the resolved turbulent scales decrease, the time‐averaged velocity and temperature are successfully predicted. The capability of predicting turbulent flow and heat transfer over a wavy wall manifests, and the PL‐DDES model has considerable potential in industrial and environmental applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207