Mesozoic C-cycle perturbations and climate: evidence for increased resilience of the Cretaceous biosphere to greenhouse pulses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mesozoic C-isotope record traces the history of the global carbon cycle. Major perturbations of the carbon cycle triggered by extraordinary volcanic activity are recorded in negative spikes coupled with positive C-isotope excursions. Prominent examples are the C-isotope anomaly events at the Permian–Triassic boundary and at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary, in the Toarcian or in the Aptian. While the major volcanic pulses at the Permian–Triassic and Triassic–Jurassic boundaries are considered as the main trigger of mass extinctions, carbon cycle perturbations in the Jurassic and Cretaceous were not accompanied by comparable extreme changes in marine or terrestrial biota. The data suggest either that changes in degassing of large igneous provinces explain the difference in the biota’s response to perturbation or (and) that the resilience of the Mesozoic biosphere to volcanic pulses changed through time. It is hypothesized that two factors contributed to the increased resilience of the biosphere in the Late Mesozoic: (1) starting in the Middle Jurassic, pelagic carbonate developed into an important sink of CO2 in the long-term carbon cycle, contributing to increased resilience of the carbon cycle to perturbations, and (2) increasing fragmentation of Pangea resulted in the establishment of a transequatorial current system coupled with equatorial upwelling. This circulation pattern was intensified during greenhouse pulses. Increased marine productivity and widespread basinal anoxia favoured burial of organic carbon. Increased resilience of the Cretaceous biosphere against volcanic activity may explain why Deccan Trap volcanism was no longer sufficient as a trigger of a mass extinction at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".