MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909060645 · doi:10.4095/299863

Central Foreland NATMAP Project: Proterozoic to Devonian stratigraphic sections in British Columbia and Yukon

2017· book· en· W2909060645 on OpenAlexaffabout
L S Lane, R B MacNaughton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeland basinDevonianProterozoicGeologyPaleontologyArchaeologyGeographyStructural basinTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NATMAP Program (1991-2003) of the Geological Survey of Canada had a mandate to support field-based bedrock and surficial mapping projects. The Central Foreland NATMAP Project (1997-2002) focused on the bedrock and surficial geology of two contrasting transects across the Cordilleran foothills, one in the northern Rocky Mountain of British Columbia, the other across the Liard Plateau of southeast Yukon and adjacent Northwest Territories. Numerous stratigraphic sections were measured in support of this work. The present Bulletin provides detailed descriptions and photographic documentation of most of the Proterozoic to Devonian sections measured during the Project, as well as a number of sections measured in the project area in the 1960s and 1970s but not previously published in detailed form. This introductory chapter summarizes the Bulletin and points the reader to additional Central Foreland NATMAP Project stratigraphic sections that have been published in other venues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→