MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909075322 · doi:10.1515/math-2018-0119

Pretty good state transfer on 1-sum of star graphs

2018· article· en· W2909075322 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hailong Hou, Rui Gu, Mengdi Tong

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Mathematics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEducation Department of Henan ProvinceHenan UniversityUniversity of WaterlooHenan University of Science and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsAdjacency matrixVertex (graph theory)Transfer (computing)Star (game theory)State (computer science)Scalar (mathematics)Unit (ring theory)GraphDiscrete mathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract LetAbe the adjacency matrix of a graphGand supposeU(t) = exp(itA). We say that we have perfect state transfer inGfrom the vertexuto the vertexvat timetif there is a scalarγof unit modulus such thatU(t)eu=γ ev. It is known that perfect state transfer is rare. So C.Godsil gave a relaxation of this definition: we say that we have pretty good state transfer fromutovif there exists a complex numberγof unit modulus and, for each positive realϵthere is a timetsuch that ‖U(t)eu–γ ev‖ <ϵ. In this paper, the quantum state transfer on 1-sum of star graphsFk,lis explored. We show that there is no perfect state transfer onFk,l, but there is pretty good state transfer onFk,lif and only ifk=l.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MathematicsSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207