Induced novel <i>psbA</i> mutation (Ala<sub>251</sub> to Thr) in higher plants confers resistance to PSII inhibitor metribuzin in <i>Lens culinaris</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Weed competition is a major limitation to worldwide lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) production in part due to limited effective safe herbicide options. Metribuzin is a photosystem II inhibiting herbicide that provides broad spectrum weed control, however it causes excessive injury in lentil. Dose response analysis of photosystem II inhibiting herbicides and DNA sequencing of the psbA chloroplast gene occurred to quantify the spectrum and mechanism of herbicide resistance in two ethyl‐methanesulfonate (EMS) induced mutant lentils. RESULTS Compared to susceptible parent PBA Flash, the level of metribuzin resistance was 33‐fold for mutant M043 and 10‐fold for M009. No improvement in resistance occurred in either mutant to bromoxynil, diuron, bromacil and atrazine herbicides. Nucleotide sequencing of the psbA gene of both mutants identified a substitution at position 751 compared to PBA Flash. The resulting deduced amino acid sequence indicated an Ala251Thr substitution as being most likely responsible for the high level of metribuzin resistance. CONCLUSIONS The Ala251Thr substitution discovered in this study is unique in mutagenized higher plants and the first report of an induced psbA target site mutation in higher plants. This target site metribuzin resistance is likely to have a significant impact on lentil production in Australia and worldwide. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".