MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

National Curriculum Framework 2005 and the English Curriculum

2018· article· en· W2909145971 on OpenAlexaff
Charu Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueMotifs A Peer Reviewed International Journal of English Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsSt. Stephen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumCurriculum mappingMathematics educationCurriculum theoryEmergent curriculumNational curriculumSociologyComputer sciencePedagogyCurriculum developmentPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are a lot of questions that can be raised regarding the selection of chapters, stories and poems in NCERT books from classes VI to XII. The difference in the guidelines (words) and practice (through the stories, poems etc.) is so wide that as a teacher one questions the values we are trying to give to our children. This paper would question the logic behind inclusion of certain chapters, poems in the syllabus of the children at the impressionable age of 11 to 16. In the name of pluralism, equity and equality, independence of thought and action what is being served to young minds is not what we expect from our children. Indeed it is felt that this gap is leading to many troubles as our teachings are different from our expectations, leaving the children in a state of complete confusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMotifs A Peer Reviewed International Journal of English StudiesSame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207