Imprimés interdits : La censure des journaux jaunes au Québec, 1955-1975
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le Quebec d'apres-guerre est apparue une nouvelle forme de communication populaire: les «journaux jaunes», ainsi baptises a cause de la pietre qualite de leur papier. On y retrouvait tous les potins concernant les artistes, les cabarets et la vie nocturne, avec des contenus fortement domines par la sexualite. Ces publications ephemeres sont vite devenues la cible du clerge et des moralisateurs qui voulaient epurer la Belle Province. Le maire Jean Drapeau caracterisait d'ailleurs ces journaux de «presse pestilentielle». Quels tactiques d'intimidation et mecanismes juridiques ont utilises religieux et politiciens pour arriver a leurs fins? Viviane Namaste met en lumiere les motivations et les strategies d'interdiction de la litterature populaire et examine pourquoi une comprehension de l'histoire de la censure peut alimenter nos reflexions actuelles, nous invitant ainsi a tirer des lecons de notre passe. Viviane Namaste est professeure titulaire a l'Institut Simone de Beauvoir et titulaire d'une Chaire de recherche sur le VIH/sida et la sante sexuelle a l'Universite Concordia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".