MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909224779 · doi:10.4095/212004

New insights into metavolcanic successions and geochemistry of the Eagle Bay Assemblage, south-central British Columbia

2001· report· en· W2909224779 on OpenAlexaffabout
S L Bailey, S J Paradis, Stephen T. Johnston

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFelsicMaficGeologyGeochemistryGreenschistVolcanic rockZirconMetamorphic faciesDevonianPetrologyFaciesPaleontologyMetamorphic rockVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eagle Bay Assemblage of the Kootenay Terrane in the Johnson and Adams lakes area comprises deformed, greenschist-facies sedimentary rocks and bimodal volcanic rocks. Two volcanic successions are present, an Upper Devonian mafic and felsic metavolcanic succession and a Lower Cambrian mafic metavolcanic succession. The latter is interbedded with archaeocyathid-bearing carbonate rocks. Upper Devonian U-Pb zircon ages of 360 ± 6 Ma have been obtained for felsic metavolcanic rocks of the bimodal succession. Lithogeochemical analyses of the metavolcanic rocks have identified two distinct metabasic successions. Mafic metavolcanic rocks of the Upper Devonian bimodal succession are alkalic, whereas Cambrian mafic metavolcanic rocks are subalkaline. The mafic metavolcanic rocks of the bimodal alkalic succession are associated with base- and precious-metal occurrences, such as the Rea, Samatosum, and Homestake deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→