MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909233505 · doi:10.4095/289498

Distribution of Cambrian formations in the eastern Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories

2012· report· en· W2909233505 on OpenAlexaffabout
K M Fallas, R B MacNaughton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDistribution (mathematics)Physical geographyGeographyArchaeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New bedrock mapping in the eastern Mackenzie Mountains (NTS 96 D and 96 E) has clarified the distribution of Cambrian formations northeast of the Mackenzie arch, notably by confirming the presence of the Lower Cambrian Mount Clark Formation. Mount Clark Formation is resistant weathering, dominated by quartz arenite, and commonly burrowed. It lies unconformably upon the Proterozoic Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup and is gradationally overlain by the Early Cambrian Mount Cap Formation. Numerous exposures previously mapped as Mount Cap Formation have been reassigned to Mount Clark Formation. Distinction between Mount Clark Formation and Proterozoic quartz sandstone units is aided by differences in colour and cementation, and particularly by the presence of burrows in the younger unit, a feature not present in older rocks. Mount Clark Formation is a hydrocarbon reservoir facies elsewhere in the Mackenzie Corridor. Improved understanding of its regional distribution may contribute to improved exploration success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207