MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909239866 · doi:10.4095/212670

40 Ar-39 Ar geochemical investigations in the central Hearne domain, western Churchill Province, Nunavut: a progress report; Radiogenic age and isotopic studies: Report 14

2001· report· en· W2909239866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H A Sanderman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiogenic nuclideGeologyGeochemistryEarth scienceMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The western Churchill Province of the northwest Canadian Shield was originally defined on the basis of wide- spread, Proterozoic K-Ar ages, but early mapping in conjunction with sparse, old K-Ar ages indicated that it con- tained preserved remnants of Archean supracrustal and granitoid rocks. A reconnaissance 40 Ar-39 Ar thermochronological investigation of a segment of crust lying along a north-northwest-trending transect from Kaminak Lake (central Hearne domain) in the south to Yathkyed Lake (northern Hearne domain) in the northwest, indicates that the Archean supracrustal belts preserve primary Archean igneous and metamorphic cooling ages for hornblende, but biotite ages were reset in the Proterozoic. The domain lying between the two supracrustal belts yielded Proterozoic ages for all dated minerals. The resetting of the 40 Ar-39 Ar systematics is attributed tolarge-scale thermal overprinting during Hudsonian deformation and magmatism at ca. 1830-1810 Ma and subse- quent slow cooling. Local evidence for ca. 1750 Maresetting of mica ages exists, but no unequivocal evidence for a ca. 1900 Ma tectonothermal event can be discerned in the 40 Ar-39 Ar thermochronological data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→