MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909263575 · doi:10.4095/223768

Geological and structural features of the Sue C uranium deposit, McClean Lake area, Saskatchewan

2007· report· en· W2909263575 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ghislain Tourigny, D H Quirt, N. S. F. Wilson, Steve Wilson, Gérard Breton, P Portella

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyUraniumGeochemistryMining engineeringArchaeologyGeographyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sue C uranium deposit is structurally controlled, basement-hosted uraninite associated with the unconformity between the late Paleoproterozoic Athabasca Group and older basement gneiss of the Wollaston Supergroup and Archean granite. Before the unconformity developed, pervasive schistosity axial planar to associated folds, steeply plunging extension lineations, and major reverse faults recorded subhorizontal Hudsonian compression and subvertical elongation. Mesoproterozoic reactivation of the graphitic fault zone after deposition of the Athabasca Group, caused broadly similar, but brittle kinematic events in basement rocks of highly contrasting rheology. Uraninite and minor uranophane±carn-ot ite±coffinite±galena±gold form massive nodules, shear and extension veins, and irregular replacement and dissemination zones within a variably white and red, clay-rich envelope. Sites of structural heterogeneity along overriding nonplanar surfaces inherited from Hudsonian deformation created dilatant jogs that fostered Mesoproterozoic fluid circulation and ore entrapment. The geochemical signature of the deposit is U with V+B+Pb+Mo+Be±Ni-As.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207