50 años de Medellín: los “ires” y “venires” de la catequesis de signo liberador.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liberating catechesis is undoubtedly one of the most important fruits of the Second Conference of the Latin American Episcopate celebrated in Medellin 50 years ago. The catechetical paradigm that emerged there revolutionized the way of understanding and doing catechesis in the continent, from a rationalistic, deductive, and mnemonic catechesis that sought the memorization and mechanical repetition of catechism content to a “situational/liberating catechesis centred n Revelation and man, where historical situations and authentically human aspirations became part of the catechesis content, and therefore, must be interpreted in present-day context, in the light of the life experiences of the Peoples of Israel, Christ, and the ecclesial community” (Medellín VIII, 6). This paper gives an account of this transformation, of the liberating paradigm characteristics, of the place occupied by catechism in that paradigm, and the almost thorough disappearance of the liberating catechesis from the offcial Latin American Church discourse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".