A Universal High-Frequency Induction Machine Model and Characterization Method for Arbitrary Stator Winding Connections
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-frequency modeling of induction machines plays an important role in investigating motor drive electromagnetic interference issues such as stator winding reflected-wave overvoltage and bearing discharging current. Characterization of high-frequency machine models requires measurements of machine's differential-mode (DM) and common-mode (CM) impedances up to tens of MHz. The machine's stator winding connections, e.g., single-, and series-, parallel-winding Y/Δ configurations, influence the measured DM and CM impedances and model parameters. In this paper, a universal high-frequency equivalent circuit model capable of representing induction machines with arbitrary stator winding connections is proposed. The new model features a simple structure with a straightforward characterization method. Specifically, only one stator winding configuration is required for impedance measurements to fully characterize the machine model for arbitrary stator winding connections. The proposed methodology is demonstrated using a 7.5 hp dual-voltage nine-terminal/lead induction machine and a drive system. The simulated DM and CM impedances as well as the motor overvoltages show excellent agreement with the experimental results. The proposed model and characterization method represent significant improvement in terms of accuracy, applicability/generality, and convenience compared to prior conventional models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it