MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909337408 · doi:10.4095/222394

Terrain inventory and geomorphic history of the south-central Mackenzie River valley region, Northwest Territories

2006· report· en· W2909337408 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Huntley, A Duk-Rodkin, Andrew Couch, C Sidwell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrainGeologyPhysical geographyGeographyArchaeologyRiver valleyGeomorphologyHydrology (agriculture)Cartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the Northern Energy DevelopmentMackenzie Valley Project, an inventory of terrain, landforms, and geomorphic processes is currently being compiled for the Camsell Bend (NTS 95 J), Root River (NTS 95 K), Dahadinni River (NTS 95 N), and Wrigley (NTS 95-O) 1:250 000 scale map sheets. This work aims to provide government agencies, industry, and the public access to secure and reliable geoscience information. The regional surficial geology is being examined to improve understanding of the limits to glaciation, subglacial processes, meltwater-drainage patterns, glacial-lake history, landslide hazards, and aggregate and groundwater resources. Outputs from this study can be used in environmental risk and impact assessments, and will provide calibration for future predictive mapping and hazard analyses in the Mackenzie River valley transportation corridor. Other possible outcomes include the attraction of new investment and reduction of risks for exploration and development of aggregate, groundwater, and mineral resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→