MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909434846 · doi:10.4095/214187

Quaternary glaciomarine environments west of Committee Bay, central mainland Nunavut

2003· report· en· W2909434846 on OpenAlexaffabout
Martine Giangioppi, E C Little, T Ferbey, C A Ozyer, D J Utting

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuaternaryBayMainlandOceanographyGeologyGeographyMainland ChinaPaleontologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maximum marine transgression limits are identified along the eastern and northern peripheries of the Ellice Hills map area (NTS 56 P), west-central coast of Committee Bay, Nunavut. An age estimate of 9000 to 8600 calendar (cal.) years BP is tentatively assigned to the absolute maximum marine limit (approximately 240-255 m a.s.l.) along this coastline, on the basis of marine features at comparable elevations along the northeast coast of Committee Bay. The lowest marine limit, observed 50 km inland at about 180m a.s.l., is associated with a later marine highstand. The westward-decreasing trend exhibited by the maximum marine limits is the result of relative sea-level fall during southwestward retreat of Keewatin ice. Marine fossils commonly form a shell lag atop offshore marine mud or, rarely, are in situ. Relative sea-level fall and progressive ice retreat resulted in a succession of marine communities following initial colonization by ice-proximal species such as Portlandia arctica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→