MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909450291 · doi:10.4095/220716

Drilling and operations overview of the Mallik 2002 Production Research Well Program

2005· report· en· W2909450291 on OpenAlexaffabout
H. Takahashi, Ed Fercho, S R Dallimore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringDrillingProduction (economics)Completion (oil and gas wells)Computer scienceOperations managementEngineeringMechanical engineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three wells, named JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 3L-38, 4L-38, and 5L-38, were drilled through gas hydrate layers at depths of approximately 900 - 1100m beneath 600mof permafrost on a line at 40 m spacing, at the Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada. Coring, logging, various scientific experiments, and production testing were performed over a 79 day period from December 25, 2001 to March 14, 2002. The Geological Survey of Canada co-ordinated the research program among the participants from five countries. The Japan National Oil Corporation along with Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. co-ordinated the operation. JAPEX Canada Ltd. acted as the legal operator in Canada, with Canadian Petroleum Engineering Inc. as consultants. All scheduled programs were completed within the limited window of one winter season, a result of the careful planning, efficient logistical preparation during the previous summer, and well organized daily activities throughout the operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207