Gold mineralization within the Red Lake mine trend: example from the Cochenour-Willans mine area, Red Lake, Ontario, with new key information from the Red Lake mine and potential analogy with the Timmins camp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detailed mapping of a large stripped outcrop revealed low-grade colloform-crustiform cockade ankerite veins and breccia and ankerite-quartz veins hosted by mafic-ultramafic Balmer assemblage volcanic rocks. Most ankerite veins and breccia are at high angle to and/or crenulated by S2, suggesting that they are pre- to early-D2 deformation. Gold mineralization is associated with arsenopyrite hosted by brecciated, more or less silicified ankerite veins and breccia and a high-grade silicified zone. Numerous east-trending 'black line faults' cut all rock types. The Cochenour and Red Lake mines are on the limbs of a F1 fold refolded by F2 folds with associated east-southeast syn-D2 deformation zones. Local andalusite-rich and carbonate-vein clasts in the Huston conglomerate underground at the Red Lake mine indicate protracted or multistage alteration events with pre- and early-D2 carbonatization and aluminous alteration and some late carbonatization. A regional unconformity (Huston conglomerate) represents a key empirical exploration target because 94% of the 27.6 M oz Au found in the district is in three deposits adjacent to the unconformity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".