MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909525562 · doi:10.63997/jct.v33i1.716

Uncovering White Settler Colonial Discourse in Curricula with Anticolonial Feminism

2018· article· en· W2909525562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum Theorizing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismColonialismWhite (mutation)CurriculumWhite paperGender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceMedia studiesHistoryPedagogyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explains a specific anticolonial feminism theoretical framework, which is utilized as a lens to enact a critical discourse analysis to uncover the ways white settler colonial ideology and discourse is (re)produced and subverted in the Ontario English curricula. This is important as the documents aim to be inclusive in their introductory goals, but throughout the documents’ expectations they (re)produce white settler colonial ideology and discourse. Although sometimes framed in problematic ways, there are opportunities within the curricula to subvert white settler colonial ideology and discourse. Overall, the paper brings to light the overt and covert ways in which the Ontario English curricula both (re)produces and subverts white settler colonial ideology and discourse and the importance of remaining in these uncomfortable spaces for reflection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it