Qui sont les personnes trans* et pourquoi ne les voit-on pas davantage participer au marché du travail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente une définition large et inclusive de ce que sont les personnes trans*.Ancrée autour de quatre repères conceptuels majeurs (le sexe biologique, l’identité de genre, l’expressionde genre et l’orientation sexuelle), cette définition est par la suite contextualisée à l’aide de quatre indicateurssociaux que sont l’âge, l’origine nationale/couleur de la peau/religion, la strate sociale et l’apparencegénérale. La prise en compte de l’ensemble de ces éléments permet au lecteur de mieux comprendre lesraisons pour lesquelles les personnes trans* sont l’objet de tant d’incompréhensions et de violences.L’article se conclut enfin par la présentation d’un ensemble de propositions concrètes à l’intention desÉtats, des Employeurs et des Syndicats afin que les droits des personnes trans* soient davantage reconnussur le marché du travail et de l’emploi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".