Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce travail s’interroge sur les particularités esthétiques et épistémologiques d’un opuscule intitulé « Le Monde des détails », publié par naturaliste Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire vers 1822. Ce texte étrange, à la fois autobiographique et biographique, est consacré à l’adolescence de Bonaparte. Cet écrit résume les vues scientifiques du général lors de son expédition en Égypte et révèle un savant décidé à rapprocher les propos du futur empereur de ses propres théories unitaires sur la création. Cette tentative d’assimilation se comprend à la lumière des débats savants qui sévissent alors à l’Académie des sciences. On y accuse Geoffroy de basculer vers la métaphysique au lieu de s’en tenir aux « faits ». Or, le savant trouve contraignantes les théories positivistes ambiantes, qui minimisent le rôle de l’imagination dans la modélisation. En invoquant le pragmatique militaire dans son récit de vie, Geoffroy tente de faire valoir les perspectives cosmogoniques qu’ils partagent tous deux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".