MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909573631 · doi:10.1109/smc.2018.00569

Constrained Optimization with Partial CP-Nets

2018· article· en· W2909573631 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirected acyclic graphTopological sortingComputer sciencePruningPartially ordered setPreferenceSet (abstract data type)Beam searchBidirectional searchTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsSearch algorithmAlgorithmCombinatoricsBest-first search

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Conditional Preference Network (CP-net) is a graphical tool for representing and reasoning about user's conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. In case the user provides partial preferences, we get a partial CP-net. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm, that we call Search-Partial-CP, to find the Pareto optimal outcomes with respect to an acyclic partial CP-net and a set of hard constraints. Search-Partial-CP is a backtrack search algorithm that utilizes the topological order of the related Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to order the variables, as well as the topological order of the partial preferences to order the values, during the instantiation process. Search-Partial-CP can significantly reduce the search space by pruning every infeasible or dominated outcome. We present and discuss the formal properties of Search-Partial-CP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConstraint Satisfaction and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207