Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contemporary city, for its complexity, often fails to give answers to the various problems concerned with environmental hazard and with energy supply. The assumed paper, in line with what is stipulated in the field of Smart and Sustainable Cities, is aimed at achieving efficient management of urban resources through a number of actions concerning the urban “layout” (urban morphologies and relationship between settlement areas, attractors and traffic generators); energy efficiency (which you get with the reuse of waters), buildings (concerning the reuse of waters for heating), mobility (through the development of a system of green infrastructures and means of electric and hybrid mobility), water quality (through constructed wetlands trails and sewage for agricultural purposes), air quality (through solutions aiming to favor the development of alternative mobility). It is also planned the implementation of Community policies such as the "EU Water Framework Directive", the "EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020", the "EU Climate Change Adaptation Strategy", "The Blueprint to safeguard Europe's water". some best practices Are presented as Rotterdam, Heerlen and Turnhout that show how energy is integrated in the urban support scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it