MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909580309 · doi:10.5539/nct.v4n1p1

Fountain Codes and Linear Filtring to Mitigate Pilot Contamination Issue in Massive MiMo

2019· article· en· W2909580309 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueNetwork and Communication Technologies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)DetectorMinimum mean square errorFountain codeChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmReal-time computingTelecommunicationsBlock codeDecoding methodsMathematicsStatisticsLinear code

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fifth generation of cellular mobile (5G) is a future technology to meet growing capacity of users. For this prupose 5G will use advanced technologies. Very large multi- input multi- output or massive MiMo (m-MiMo) is considered as one of the promising technology. Nevertheless, the performance of m-MiMo is limited by pilot contamination issue. In fact, to mitigate pilot contamination issues in massive multi-input multi-output (m-MiMo), we proposed in previous work a new scheme where Raptor decoded symbols are used to estimate channel with Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) technique. The main benefit of this method is that the receiver does not need a transmitted pilot symbols to evaluate the channel, which allows saving power at transmission. The results showed that the MMSE scheme achieved the ideal case of the perfect channel. In this precedent paper, the MMSE detector and raptor code are used for their robustness among other schemes of linear detectors, and corrector codes, nevertheless, in case of m-MiMO, it was shown that all linear detectors work optimally. For this purpose, we include in this present article an additional linear filter to enhance the prior study, in which two supplementary detectors are considered, namely Zero Forcing (ZF) and Maximum Ratio Compression (MRC). The objective of this paper is to determine the ideal filtering technique and the robustness fountain code to address pilot contamination problem. In fact, the simulation results show that the ZF can attain the same ideal performance as the MMSE with raptor decoded symbols while MRC achieved lower performance compared to the other two shemes. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it