Deformation characteristics of saturated clay in three-dimensional cyclic stress state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamic stress field induced by moving loads is three dimensional, involving the cyclic variation of major, intermediate, and minor principal stresses, while so far very limited laboratory studies have been undertaken on the one-way deformation behavior of saturated clays in three-dimensional stress state. In this study, an advanced true triaxial apparatus, which can apply cyclic major and intermediate principal stresses simultaneously, is employed to carry out a total of 65 one-way cyclic tests on both normally and overconsolidated clays. Four values of overconsolidation ratio (OCR), five values of bcyc, which is termed the coefficient of cyclic intermediate principal stress, and a wide range of cyclic stress ratios (CSR) are tested. Emphasis is put on the effects of bcyc and OCR on the characteristics of permanent major and intermediate principal strains. Test results show that the increase of bcyc significantly reduces the accumulation of major principal strain, and linear relationships are observed between the permanent major principal strain and bcyc for test data with the same CSR, OCR, and cycle number. A critical value of bcyc ≈ 0.5, at which the permanent intermediate principal strain changes from tension to compression, is observed for the remolded clay. Furthermore, an empirical model is proposed, allowing the long-term deformation of saturated clays to be predicted in three-dimensional cyclic stress state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".