MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Levels of Contaminants in Human Populations in the Canadian Arctic

2018· article· en· W2909632979 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of OttawaUniversité LavalHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthArcticGeographyPopulationContaminationThe arcticIndigenousEnvironmental protectionCircumpolar starEnvironmental scienceEcologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Levels of environmental contaminants, which are transported to the Arctic via air/water currents, have been shown to be elevated in northern populations, primarily Inuit. For more than 25 years, the Northern Contaminants Program (NCP) has funded research in response to concerns about exposure to contaminants from traditional, northern indigenous diets. Recently, NCP completed a human health assessment report, which provides a summary of current knowledge regarding contaminants and human health in northern Canada.Data from NCP funded studies were compiled to summarize levels of contaminants among Inuit children, pregnant mothers, women of childbearing age, and adult men and women. Data was also used to identify time trends and provide regional descriptive comparisons.This assessment found that concentrations of contaminants are higher in Inuit from northern Canada relative to the Canadian general population. This is primarily due to dietary exposure to contaminants from the consumption of certain country foods such as marine mammals. Inuit populations living in Nunavut and Nunavik, where these country foods are typically eaten more frequently or in larger amounts, had higher levels of contaminants. Time trend data show declining levels of organochlorines and metals (such as mercury and lead), by up to 80% and 60% respectively, in pregnant Inuit women from Nunavik (1992-2013). Despite this, levels remain elevated compared to the Canadian general population. Since the completion of the assessment new projects have been funded and these will also be highlighted.Strong time trend data are available for Nunavik; however more information is needed in other regions. New chemical groups have emerged in the Arctic. While human exposure data is still limited, data is being generated through new research. Additional conclusions, knowledge gaps and recommendations for future northern studies are detailed in the NCP human health assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it