MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909646655 · doi:10.4095/222639

Geology, Mount Martin, Yukon Territory-Northwest, Territories-British, Columbia

2006· report· en· W2909646655 on OpenAlexaffabout
K M Fallas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMountGeologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mount Martin map area is situated at the southern end of the Franklin Mountains in a foothills physiographic setting. The geology of the area is characterized by sedimentary strata of Carboniferous to Paleogene age, exposed in a series of box folds whose geometry is controlled largely by the competence of the Carboniferous Mattson Formation. Permian strata formerly included in the upper member of the Mattson Formation have been mapped separately as the Tika formation. Upper Paleozoic and Triassic strata are overlain unconformably by Lower Cretaceous rocks of the Chinkeh Formation and younger units. Sub-Cretaceous erosion is a major control on the distribution of upper Paleozoic and Triassic units within the map area. Paleogene conglomerate and sandstone, interpreted as representing a syn- to post-orogenic fluvial system, is locally preserved in the La Biche River valley. The sinuous appearance in map view of major structures is largely due to en echelon linkages of smaller culminations involving interfering northeast- and northwest-trending folds. The east limb of the Mount Martin anticline is cut by a reverse or thrust fault of minor displacement (tens to hundreds of metres). The Kotaneelee gas field produces from Middle Devonian carbonate units in a structural culmination associated with the Mount Martin Anticline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→