MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909718080 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v10i1.3212

Neuroinvasive West Nile Virus Presenting as Acute Flaccid Paralysis: A Case Report

2019· article· en· W2909718080 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jessica Watari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticOutbreakAcute flaccid paralysisEncephalitisAsymptomatic carrierWest Nile virusParalysisFlaccid paralysisPediatricsMeningitisVirologyDiseaseVirusSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

West Nile virus, a mosquito-borne infection, is known to cause a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic infection to neuroinvasive disease. Advanced age is a known risk factor for developing neuroinvasive disease and also a prognostic indicator of long-term recovery. We present a case of neuroinvasive West Nile virus infection in a 78-year-old man who presented with acute flaccid paralysis and altered mental status. Positive IgM for West Nile virus in the cerebrospinal fluid confirmed the diagnosis. Individuals presenting with meningitis, encephalitis, and/or acute flaccid paralysis should be assessed for West Nile virus especially if presenting during outbreaks in the summer and fall months. Although treatment remains supportive, prompt diagnosis and reporting of the infection can identify potential outbreaks, emphasize the importance of preventative measures, and promote clinician awareness. J Med Cases. 2019;10(1):21-23 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3212

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicMosquito-borne diseases and control→French-language works237,207→