Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studied on the education reform of Cameron conservative-liberal democrat coalition government after 2010 in England, focusing on Academy and Studio School. Firstly we arranged main issues of these policies, and secondary we analyzed some cases. We visited two areas of England: Halifax of West Yorkshire and Fulham of London to do research some cases of the conversion from maintained schools to Academies, the establishment of a further education college as Free Schools and a Studio School which is a new-type school to connect key stage 4 with key stage 5. They introduced Academies and Free Schools to resolve some local education challenges. But the number of students who entered those schools were not enough. So they were suffering from financial difficulties and lack of teachers. The results of Ofsted inspections were ‘inadeqate’and the Academy Trust of Halifax was dissolved. We found the school management was so unstable and the educational conditions of the schools were poor in these cases. The education policies of the government did not bring the successful result as expected. But the cases of our research were few and the aspects of schools we analyzed were limited. It is necessary to see more cases and analyze various aspects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".