Electrical resistivity characteristics of mineralized and unmineralized rocks from Giant and Con mine areas, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrical characteristics have been determined for ten mineralized and nonmineralized rock samples from the Con and Giant mines, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. These samples represent the main lithologies present around the mineralized shear zones: sericite schist, chlorite schist, chlorite-sericite schist, basalt, and gold-bearing ore. The purpose was to obtain information required to help develop exploration strategies. Results indicate that mineralized to moderately mineralized rocks investigated in this study show electrical resistivities (rr) in the ranges of 37-130 ohm·m and 360-980 ohm·m, with electrical anisotropy (l) values in the range of 2:1 to 46:1. A clear relationship is seen between the foliation and the electrical anisotropy in these samples. The rr for the poorly to nonmineralized rocks are in the range of 1500-24 000 ohm·m, with l values of 2:1 to 7:1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".