Contributions to the sedimentology of the Strites Pond Formation Cambro-Ordovician Phillipsburg Group, southwestern Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cambro-Ordovician Strites Pond Formation of the Philipsburg Group overlies the Rock River Formation with an apparent tectonic contact and is disconformably overlain by the Wallace Creek Formation. The Strites Pond Formation consists of a lower dolostone member characterized by bioclastic, oolitic dolopackstone to grainstone and perva- sively coarse-crystalline dolostone, and an upper limestone member of thickly bedded mudstone and thrombolitic bioherm interbeds. Subordinate carbonate-rich sandstone and shale layers occur in both members. Microbially laminated dolostone also occurs within the uppermost part of the formation. Sedimentological attributes of the Strites Pond Formation suggest a subtidal to intertidal ooid and bioclast shoals to a subtidal environment domi- nated by mound-building microbial organisms. High-order sea-level fluctuations and vicinity of terrestrial siliciclastic supply area are manifested by numerous coarse-grained sandstone interbeds throughout the forma- tion. The overlying Wallace Creek Formation accumulated in a deeper marine setting suggesting a sea-level rise after deposition of the Strites Pond Formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".