Modelling the response of the Cased Hole Formation Resistivity tool in order to determine the depth of gas hydrate dissociation during the thermal test in the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate production research well
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate research well was an integral part of a field experiment to test the physical response of a gas hydrate deposit to various advanced production methods. Iterative forward modelling of Cased Hole Formation Resistivity tool (CHFRTM) logs was used to determine the annular radius of gas hydrate dissociation that occurred around the wellbore during the thermal test in the Mallik 5L-38 well. Modelled results demonstrated that the radius of gas hydrate dissociation exhibited large local variations and was far from uniform. The comparison of the CHFR modelled results with the gas volumes measured at the surface indicate that most of the gas produced during the thermal test in the Mallik 5L-38 well was accurately measured at the surface. The CHFR modelling procedure shows promise for use in future single-well evaluation of gas hydrate dissociation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".