MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909833105 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.5570

9. Au bout de « la » peine ? Les femmes âgées incarcérées au Canada

2013· book-chapter· fr· W2909833105 on OpenAlexaffabout
Véronique Strimelle

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Durant la dernière décennie, le phénomène du vieillissement des populations occidentales a été au cœur d’un grand nombre de recherches et de rapports. Ingénieurs biomédicaux, biologistes, économistes, sociologues, démographes et philosophes continuent de se pencher sur les différentes facettes de cette question et sur son impact personnel et sociétal.La recherche criminologique a elle aussi abordé ce sujet, en prêtant une attention particulière au vieillissement en milieu carcéral. Plusieurs...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks→Same topicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis→French-language works237,207→