MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909881454 · doi:10.4095/226147

Regional variation in structural style, deformation kinematics, and summary of tectonic history, northeast Ellesmere Island

2008· report· en· W2909881454 on OpenAlexaff
J C Harrison

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyVariation (astronomy)TectonicsStyle (visual arts)KinematicsDeformation (meteorology)PaleontologyPhysical geographyGeodesyGeographyOceanographyArchaeologyAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major features of northeastern Ellesmere Island include faulted Paleoproterozoic basement to the south (uplifted to 2300 m); a narrow, low-relief belt of steep faults and gently inclined lower Paleozoic craton cover that extends under an arcuate, southerly to southeasterly transported, foreland thrust ("foothills") belt involving Ordovician - Devonian shelf strata, and Paleocene, orogen-derived conglomerate; a similarly arcuate "front range" belt of en échelon thrusts carrying Neoproterozoic to Devonian strata; a high-relief (to 2000 m) "main range" fold belt of cleaved Neoproterozoic to Cambrian outer-shelf strata; and an interior plateau featuring cleaved and tightly folded lower Paleozoic basinal deposits. The "main ranges" terminate along strike to the northeast in a braided sinistral fault array parallel to Nares Strait. Displacement on sinistral faults is kinematically linked to "front range" and foreland restraining bend thrusts. Early-formed folds and thrusts within the sinistral fault array have been rotated counterclockwise during northerly directed Late Paleocene - Eocene indentation of the Greenland plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207