MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909889747 · doi:10.4095/211639

New U-Pb ages from the Eastern Coast Belt, southern British Columbia; Radiogenic age and isotopic studies: Report 13

2000· report· en· W2909889747 on OpenAlexaffabout
G J Woodsworth, V J McNicoll, Richard M. Friedman, Margaret E. Rusmore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiogenic nuclideGeologyArchaeologyGeochemistryOceanographyGeographyMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Six new U-Pb ages for southern Coast Belt plutons are presented. A 66.6 ± 1.1 Ma titanite age from the Machmell pluton within the southern Coast shear zone provides a maximum age for motion at that location. In the eastern Waddington thrust belt, the Homathko Peak tonalite, a fault slice within the belt, is 153.4 ± 0.3 Ma; the postkinematic Tiedemann pluton is early Tertiary. In the Mount Raleigh area, a monazite date of 85.0 ± 0.5 Ma provides a minimum age for crystallization and a maximum age for amphibolite-facies metamorphism of the Sisyphus Creek leucogranite. The synkinematic Mount Gilbert pluton crystallized at 83.6 ± 0.2 Ma, indicating that metamorphism and thrusting in the Mount Raleigh pendant occurred at that time. The postkinematic Bishop River pluton intruded at 72.2 ± 0.4 Ma. Similarities between the Mount Raleigh and eastern Waddington areas indicate that they form part of an extensive Late Cretaceous fold-and-thrust belt in the eastern Coast Belt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→