MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909904944 · doi:10.4095/223682

2005 reconnaissance field program in Peel Plateau and Peel Plain region, Northwest Territories and Yukon Territory

2006· report· en· W2909904944 on OpenAlexaffabout
Leanne J. Pyle, Adrienne Jones, L P Gal, J G Abbott, A D McCracken, M G Fowler, L D Stasiuk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateau (mathematics)GeologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyGeographyGeomorphologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2005, reconnaissance fieldwork was carried out in Peel Plateau and Peel Plain (Peel region) which lies along the northern Mackenzie corridor. Peel region is a prospective petroleum province that straddles the Northwest Territories - Yukon Territory border, and the focus of a four-year, multi-agency study. Reconnaissance on the regional geology and petroleum potential included surveying river exposures in Peel region and along the deformation front that flanks the western and southern edges of Peel Plateau (Richardson and Mackenzie mountains, respectively) within Trail River (NTS 106 L), Snake River (NTS 106 F), Ramparts River (NTS 106 G), and Sans Sault Rapids (NTS 106 H) map areas. Rock-Eval® pyrolysis forTOCof potential source-rock horizons indicates excellent original source-rock potential of the Canol and Hare Indian formations. Conodont samples provide new biostratigraphic ages for Ordovician to Devonian strata. Conodont colour alteration index values range from 2 to 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Studies and Ecology→French-language works237,207→