Interweavings: Threads of art education, poetry and phenomenological grapplings / Entrelacements : éléments d’éducation artistique, de poésie et questionnements phénoménologiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This three-authored paper describes our individual responses to a video, Dwelling, by Japanese artist Hiraki Sawa. The nine-minute video is a wordless, but not soundless, presentation of jet planes flying within the confines of the artist’s apartment. We chose the Youtube video in order to be able to share an artwork although we were working in three different cities at the time. Our responses consist of our individual poetic and visual (photographs, collage, paintings) interpretations of the video in conjunction with theory. We use phenomenology as our theoretical framework and underlying philosophy, and connect it with arts based research. Keywords: Art Education; Poetry; Visual Art; Phenomenology.Résumé : Trois auteurs relatent dans cet article leurs réactions personnelles au visionnement de la vidéo Dwelling de l’artiste japonais Hiraki Sawa. Cette vidéo de neuf minutes, sans paroles mais avec son, montre des avions à réaction volant à l’intérieur de l’appartement de l’artiste. Bien que travaillant dans trois villes différentes à ce moment là, nous avons choisi la diffusion sur Youtube pour partager cette œuvre d’art. Nos réactions sont en fait nos interprétations personnelles poétiques et visuelles (photos, collage, peintures) de cette vidéo accompagnées de points théoriques. Notre cadre théorique et notre philosophie sous-jacente s’inspirent de la phénoménologie pour établir un lien avec la recherche artistique. Mots-clés : éducation artistique, poésie, art visuel, phénoménologie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".