Improved Pedestrian Dead Reckoning Based on a Robust Adaptive Kalman Filter for Indoor Inertial Location System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) systems based on a microelectromechanical-inertial measurement unit (MEMS-IMU) providing advantages of full autonomy and strong anti-jamming performance are becoming a feasible choice for pedestrian indoor positioning. In order to realize the accurate positioning of pedestrians in a closed environment, an improved pedestrian dead reckoning algorithm, mainly including improved step estimation and heading estimation, is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the original signal is preprocessed using the wavelet denoising algorithm. Then, the multi-threshold method is proposed to ameliorate the step estimation algorithm. For heading estimation suffering from accumulated error and outliers, robust adaptive Kalman filter (RAKF) algorithm is proposed in this paper, and combined with complementary filter to improve positioning accuracy. Finally, an experimental platform with inertial sensors as the core is constructed. Experimental results show that positioning error is less than 2.5% of the total distance, which is ideal for accurate positioning of pedestrians in enclosed environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".