MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909911717 · doi:10.7202/1054028ar

L’impact et l’éthique du savoir musical

2010· article· fr· W2909911717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of PennsylvaniaAmerican Academy for Jewish Research
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article discute l’impact potentiel du savoir musical dans le vaste monde en dehors de l’université. En retraçant l’impact en cours d’un seul cas d’étude ethnomusicologique, l’article éclaire les questions politiques et éthiques qui resteraient amorphes si elles étaient uniquement approchées à un niveau théorique. L’article invite les universitaires en musique à considérer les façons à travers lesquelles leurs travaux ont le potentiel de transcender le monde du chercheur et d’adresser ainsi les dilemmes qui surgissent à la frontière entre les valeurs universitaires et les critères locaux. La réflexion suggère que les questions épineuses de l’évaluation, de l’arrangement et de l’interprétation vont continuer d’être posées et que les solutions à ces dilemmes éthiques ont besoin d’être locales et contingentes tout en restant conséquentes avec les critères universitaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0080.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it