MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2909949449 · doi:10.4095/248071

Petroleum Resource Assessment, Paleozoic successions of the St. Lawrence Platform and Appalachians of eastern Canada

2009· report· en· W2909949449 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denis Lavoie, Nicolas Pinet, J R Dietrich, P K Hannigan, S Castonguay, A P Hamblin, P. S. Giles

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleozoicGeologyPetroleumResource (disambiguation)Petroleum explorationArchaeologyMining engineeringPaleontologyGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cambrian-Permian successions in eastern Canada belong to three tectonostratigraphic domains, 1) the autochthonous St. Lawrence Platform, underlain by Cambrian to Devonian (?) rocks which extends from southern Quebec to western Newfoundland, 2) the Appalachians formed by Cambrian to Devonian rocks lying south and east of the St. Lawrence Platform and extending to the Atlantic Ocean, and 3) autochthonous Carboniferous to Permian rocks located offshore in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and in the onshore surrounding areas. Each succession contains unique source rock and reservoir units and specific trap types. Even though all of the basins contain producing or discovered hydrocarbon fields, there has been no recent evaluation of their ultimate oil and gas resource potential. A total of 15 conventional petroleum plays and 3 unconventional gas plays have been recognized in Paleozoic strata. Two conventional plays are recognized in Quaternary sediments. Of the 15 conventional Paleozoic plays, 6 have sufficient exploration and/or production data or good analogues to formulate a full quantitative assessment. Of these 6 plays, 4 are assessed for oil and gas potential, 1 for oil potential, and 1 for gas potential. Given the fact that a large number of conventional and all of the unconventional plays cannot be quantitatively assessed, the total resource presented herein is a minimum potential as evidence for hydrocarbon charge is compelling in most of the qualitatively assessed plays. The assessed plays of the eastern Canada Paleozoic basins have a cumulative median (P50%) in-place potential of 1170*109 m3 (41 Tcf) of natural gas and 403*106 m3 (2.5 BBO) of oil. The Carboniferous Maritimes Basin accounts for about 95% (1109*109 m3 or 39 Tcf) and 60% (235*106 m3 or 1.5 BBO) of the total gas and oil resource potential, respectively. The assessment results provide important new insights into the energy resource endowment of Paleozoic basins in eastern Canada. In particular, the assessment results indicate Carboniferous basins have a large gas resource potential, much higher than previously estimated. Moreover, the preliminary estimates from the industry (not quantitatively evaluated in this report) of the shale gas potential in the Ordovician succession alone, is assumed to be over 40 Tcf. Our sincere thanks to Jim Dixon who reviewed the initial draft and made very useful comments and suggestions for improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207