Étude en population de la fréquence de navigation et de contact pour soins palliatifs avant le décès de patients atteints de cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, la navigation des patients atteints de cancer a vu le jour en Nouvelle-Écosse, en 2002, à l’instigation d’infirmières en oncologie ayant décidé de soutenir les patients du diagnostic au décès. La présente étude voulait déterminer la fréquence (et la variation de fréquence) des services de navigation et de contacts pour soins palliatifs chez les adultes décédés entre 2011 et 2014 après avoir reçu un diagnostic de cancer ainsi que des services de navigation. Parmi les 2 532 sujets de l’étude, 56,7 % ont bénéficié de services de navigation pendant plus d’un mois et 30,6 % ont eu un contact pour soins palliatifs. Certaines variations ont été observées entre les régions géographiques, les stades de cancer, le temps écoulé entre le diagnostic et le décès, et la cause du décès (attribuable ou non au cancer). Il serait bon d’étudier plus en détail le rôle de la navigation pour les personnes en fin de vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".