MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2909966995 · doi:10.4095/213074

Plutonic rocks of the eastern Bella Coola map area, southwest British Columbia

2002· report· en· W2909966995 on OpenAlexaffabout
M G Hrudey, L C Struik, L J Diakow, J. Brian Mahoney, G J Woodsworth, H A Sparks, Elke Kaiser, T P Gleeson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBELLAArchaeologyGeographyGeologyAncient historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The abundant plutonic rocks of the eastern Bella Coola map area are mostly of intermediate composition and are interpreted as Jurassic to Eocene. They are subdivided into five intrusive suites, one intrusive complex, and several undifferentiated plutons. The Salloomt suite ((?)Jurassic) is dominated by medium-grained, hornblende-rich diorite. The Kalone suite of biotite-hornblende tonalite is involved in ductile deformation within shear zones adjacent to Jump Across Creek. The Talcheazoone suite consists of uniformly foliated quartz diorite. The Firvale suite comprises altered Early Cretaceous biotite granodiorite. The Four Mile suite comprises pristine biotite-muscovite granite; these plutons truncate a regional pattern of the northwest-trending folds and shear zones. The Crag Creek intrusive complex is diorite and gabbro cut by numerous locally sheeted dykes of granodiorite, rhyolite, basalt, and andesite. Some lens-like sills between screens of country rock may have formed along pre-existing, subvertical structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→