MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The New Trends of Development Strategy on the International Space and Earth Observation Technology

2011· article· en· W2909975438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
An Pei-jun Gao Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueYaogan jishu yu yingyong · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth observationEarth observation satellitePlan (archaeology)Earth (classical element)GeographySatelliteWork (physics)PlanetPolitical scienceSpace (punctuation)EngineeringComputer scienceAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent development strategies and plans on space and earth observation technology of some countries such as the U.S.,Russia,Japan and Canada,and GEO and ESA are introduced briefly.The plans or reports are as follows:Development of the U.S.Integrated Earth Observation System:Progress and Recommendations for the Way Forward,Science Plan for NASA's Science Mission Directorate 2007~2016,the Earth Observation Satellite Plan 2006~2015 in Russia,JAXA 2025,Earth Observation for a Healthy,Safe and Prosperous Canada——Towards a Federal Earth Observation Strategy and the Earth Observation Focus Areas,GEO 2007~2009 Work Plan Toward Convergence,The Changing Earth:New Scientific Challenges for ESA's Living Planet Programme.The characteristics of space and Earth observation technology in the world are analyized according to the reports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYaogan jishu yu yingyongSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207