MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910005922 · doi:10.24235/jm.v3i2.3728

HAK JAMAAH HAJI ATAS HASIL PENGELOLAAN SETORAN AWAL BIAYA PENYELENGGARAAN IBADAH HAJI

2018· article· id· W2910005922 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAl-Mustashfa Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWOT analysisPolitical scienceHumanitiesBusinessBusiness administrationSociologyMarketingPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperative as a manifestation of the economic development of democracy. This happens when the cooperative is well managed, The existence of cooperatives in the District of Gunungjati has not described the cooperative as a form of economic development populist.This study aims to answer from the questions that become the formulation of the problem , h ow SWOT Cooperative as a Form of Community Economic Development in the District of Gunungjati ? This research uses qualitative research,The data collected by interview technique (interview), observation, documentation and then analyzed by descriptive method of analysis.The SWOT analysis results that can be submitted by the authors are the cooperatives in the District of Gunungjati has the power in management,And has a weakness of the level of public confidence,Besides the cooperative opportunities for cooperation with financial institutions are very open,On the other hand the threat is the ease of provision of borrowers of informants (middlemen) who are still very difficult to overcome. Keywords : Cooperative , SWOT Analysis, and Community Economic . Abstrak Koperasi sebagai wujud dari pembangunan ekonomi kerakyatan. Hal ini terjadi apabila koperasi dikelola dengan baik, keberadaan koperasi di Kecamatan Gunungjati belum mendiskripsikan koperasi sebagai wujud pembangunan ekonomi kerakyatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab dari pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang menjadi rumusan masalah, b agaimana SWOT Koperasi Sebagai Wujud Pembangunan Ekonomi Kerakyatan di Wilayah Kecamatan Gunungjati? Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kualitatif, data yang dikumpulkan dengan teknik interview (wawancara), observasi, dokumentasi kemudian dianalisis dengan metode deskriptif analisis. Adapun hasil analisis SWOT yang dapat disimpulkan oleh penulis adalah koperasi-koperasi di Kecamatan Gunungjati memiliki kekuatan di manajemen, dan mempunyai kelemahan dari tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat, selain itu peluang koperasi untuk kerjasama dengan lembaga keuangan sangat terbuka, disisi lain ancamannya adalah kemudahan penyediaan pinjam informan (tengkulak) yang masih sangat sulit diatasi. Kata Kunci: Koperasi, Analisis SWOT, dan Ekonomi Kerakyatan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it