MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910041393 · doi:10.4095/211991

An intercalibrated biostratigraphy of the Upper Triassic of Black Bear Ridge, Williston Lake, northeast British Columbia

2001· report· en· W2910041393 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael J. Orchard, Christopher A. McRoberts, E. T. Tozer, M J Johns, Michael R. Sandy, J S Shaner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiostratigraphyGeologyRidgePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black Bear Ridge on Williston Lake is one of several important North American reference sections for intercalibrating the ranges of Upper Triassic ammonoids, conodonts, bivalves, ichthyoliths, and brachiopods. The section (Ludington and Pardonet formations) spans the uppermost Carnian through Hettangian of the Lower Jurassic. The co-occurrence of several fossil groups facilitates an integrated biozonation of the interval. Fossil fauna and biofacies serve to identify significant biological and sedimentary events in the history of the Late Triassic. Conodont and ichthyolith faunal change is gradual through the Carnian-Norian boundary, whereas conodont and ammonoid changes are dramatic across the Lower-Middle Norian boundary. Major transgressions are recog- nized in both the Lower and Middle Norian, and are marked by a conodont (Norigondolella) and ichthyolith (Birgeria) biofacies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→