Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jeune prodige du cinema quebecois, Xavier Dolan presente toujours des films incontournables au sein du cinema quebecois. Ses oeuvres montrent ainsi le portrait d’une place particuliere et originale dans l''histoire du cinema quebecois. Dans Laurence Anyways et Tom a la ferme, les limites entre l’espace social et celui de l''intime deviennent floues. Ces deux films permettent aux spectateurs de percevoir l''imaginaire comme le seul cadre ayant le pouvoir de definir les lieux. Les personnages circulent d’un endroit a un autre sans appartenance particuliere comme si les lieux ne les influencaient en aucune facon. Chez Dolan, la trajectoire identitaire des heros revele souvent le lien etroit avec cette liberte concernant la spatialisation. Liberes des cadres traditionels spatiaux, les protagonistes confirment leur identite a l’ecart de la loi traditionnelle occidentale. Ce probleme identitaire illustre d''une certaine maniere la question identitaire de la nationalite quebecoise. En raison des communautes exterieures qui le composent, le Quebec se transforme aujourd''hui comme une societe davantage ouverte et advantage tendue vers la communication. Construits sur la diversite et l’universel, les images et les discours dans Laurence Anyways et Tom a la ferme paraissent en rupture avec le nationalisme bien marque du cinema quebecois traditionnel. Si le film etait considere comme un miroir de la societe, les oeuvres cinematograpiques dolaniennes pourraient representer un miroir apatride du Quebec. Original par rapport a ses predecesseurs, Dolan interroge la veritable identite quebecoise via sa propre esthetique cinematographique. Ses films ouvrent des perspectives entre le Meme et l’''Autre en recusant des definitions identitaires fermees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".